The Twin Evils of Abortion and Euthanasia

Editorial
November/December, 1996
Volume 31, Number 6

One of the primary causes of death in the United States is abortion. With the blessing of the United States Supreme Court, abortionists are killing 1.5 million unborn children each year.

Some months ago we heard about a mother murdering her children in a car which she pushed into a lake. People all over America struggled with heartbreak and anger when they learned that Susan Smith had drowned her two sons in Union, South Carolina. Where is the same kind of distress over the 1,500,000 loveable unborn children whose lives are aborted every year in this country? It is our conviction that abortion stays legal, in part, because so few fully grasp the horror of it–especially the partial birth abortions which are legally permitted.

But abortion is only the beginning. Those who accept the practice of abortion find that the logic easily leads to infanticide and euthanasia. Some highly respected scientists have for a number of years openly recommended infanticide for genetic reasons (Newsweek, September 6, 1982). It is already obvious that killing tiny human beings before they are born, leads to less shock about killing them after they are born. The steep rise in cases of child abuse is surely related to the lightness with which people are viewing the sacredness of human life in general.

Our Washington Office speaks much about laws related to immigration and disarmament and the environment, but scarcely a word is heard in protest of the “partial birth abortion” bill that was vetoed on April 10, 1996.

Another step that is precipitated by the same logic that is used to support abortion, is the growing approval that is given to euthanasia. The October 7, 1996 issue of Time magazine reports that in Darwin, Australia, a man named Bob Dent, a cancer patient, “died by lethal injection” and “this was the world’s first legal mercy killing.” The latest Gallup Poll reports that “Fifty percent of Americans say physician-assisted suicide should be legal; 41 percent disagree (USA Today, October 7, 1996). BRF applauds the 1996 Annual Conference statement which says that “the active and intentional taking of life, including assisted suicide, is unacceptable,” and that “allowing human pain and suffering to go unrelieved, or prolonging the dying process with extraordinary medical interventions” is also unacceptable. What is troubling, however, is the near silence about issues surrounding abortion.

–Harold S. Martin

The Twin Evils of Abortion and Euthanasia

by Craig Alan Myers

One of the most distressing developments of recent years is the growing disregard for human life. The widespread acceptance of evolutionary theory is an important milestone in the denial of the biblical view of life, for it seems that as our society abandons any pretense of belief in God and ultimate judgment, less attention is paid to the importance and sacredness of human life. When society views life as beginning merely as a blob of protoplasm, and ending with decomposition into the elements, it is no wonder that life is thought of so carelessly. Evolution makes life ultimately meaningless.

But human life is sacred, for it is something created by the Living God. Human life has always been under attack. Satan sought to destroy the life that God brought forth on the earth. Cain killed his brother Abel in the first murder. Lamech, in Genesis 4, boasts of his murder of another human being. War takes murder and expands it to a mass scale.

When conflicts between the United States and another country arises, it is not long before someone says that the U.S. ought to “nuke ’em”–meaning the total destruction of human life and property. Video games and cartoons glorify the elimination of the hero’s enemies. Motion pictures, television programs and news coverage tend emphasize violence and killing, knowing that they attract viewers.

Violence in the media has gained a great deal of attention. Churches have petitioned against it, and the government threatens broadcasters in order to curb it. Violence in the media, it is said, is a powerful influence toward violence in society.

But more subtle and troubling is the growing tolerance and acceptance of abortion. We have been witnessing the war on the unborn. With the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 by the United States Supreme Court, abortion has gone from a last desperate attempt to avoid the consequences of pregnancy to being simply “another choice” in birth control methods. Erwin Lutzer, in Twelve Myths Americans Believe, points out, “Today, abortion is big business. With 1.5 million abortions each year, costing an average of $350 each, abortion clinics make tens of thousands of dollars daily. When business is slack, those who admit pregnant women do all they can to encourage an abortion regardless of the medical or emotional consequences” (p. 106). Because it happens in the sterile surroundings of a clean, gleaming “health facility,” abortion lacks the shocking effect of the same number of deaths on a battlefield or even on the highways. This is what makes it so subtle and able to be ignored.

Now, a grimmer specter is approaching. Mercy killing or euthanasia–from the Greek words meaning “easy death”–is becoming more acceptable. Some healthcare providers are actively assisting those who wish to take their own lives, and some are taking others’

lives into their own hands. A former Colorado governor and candidate for president once said that older persons “have a duty to die and get out of the way.” Since 1990, retired pathologist Jack Kevorkian has assisted in the suicide or self-murder of 41 individuals, as of this writing. Now Kevorkian was tried for several of the crimes, juries–one of which included a United Methodist bishop–refused to convict him, for they were convinced that human beings have a “right to die.”

While big news for a while, Kevorkian’s ghoulish work is less visible. Perhaps by the time he kills 50 people, it won’t draw any more attention than a car accident. But Kevorkian is only the most outlandish of those advocating the so-called right to die. He recently appeared before the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., and said, “Do you think it’s dignified to hang from wood with nails through your hands and feet bleeding…? Had Christ died in my van–with people around him who loved him–it would be far more dignified. My rusty old van.” Of course, Christians know that Jesus Christ died a horrible death, a repugnant death, with all dignity stripped from him. Jesus came to die for the sins of humanity, not to die a dignified death.

Abortion and euthanasia are related, for they confront the common thread of the sacredness of human life as the highest creation of God. They engage in common work to destroy the life that God alone can give, and they are sinful humanity’s ultimate act of rebellion against a holy God.

The Divine Gift of Human Life

If we consider the creation of human life by God in Genesis 1:26-2:6, we find that human life is a precious gift from God for several reasons.

Human life is a result of God’s sovereign choice. God said, “Let us create man in our image, after our likeness.” God did not have to create humanity. He chose to do so, as the crowning glory of His creation. God made human life important in the very choice of its creation.

Human life reflects God’s image. It shows God’s natural likeness or personality. Human beings, unlike all other creatures, express choice, are aware of themselves, and have the ability to reason. These traits are shared by God and man. Man also mirrors God’s moral likeness, by knowing the difference between right and wrong. Animals do things out of instinct; humans do things out of choice, and will give an account for their actions. Joni Eareckson Tada–the well-known Christian artist, quadriplegic and disability advocate–writes, “Created in the image of God, humans are imprinted with transcendent qualities–beyond-this-world characteristics such as compassion, kindness, self-control, and patience. It is these qualities that place us worlds apart from brute beasts” (Christian Research Journal, Spring 1996, p. 17).

Human life fulfills God’s purposes. God gave Adam and Eve a position. In Genesis 1:26, 28 we find that humans are to have dominion or rule over creation. God also gave them a job to work out the position. Eden was not a place of idleness, but a place of God-given employment. In Ephesians 1 we find the even greater goal of human existence, in that “as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love” (Ephesians 1:4), and “that we should be to the praise of his glory” (Ephesians 1:12). Mankind is to reflect God’s glory.

Human life is a personal work of God. Genesis tells us that God took a special interest in this aspect of his creation. The other creatures were created by the mere word of God (if indeed it can be called “mere”). Simply the fact that God personally made man out of the dust of the earth has of tremendous importance.

Further in the Scriptures, God upholds the value of human life in the Ten Commandments. He says, “You shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13, NIV). This is an all-encompassing directive. It includes homicide (murder of another), suicide (murder of self), regicide (murder of a ruler), feticide (murder of a fetus), infanticide (murder of babies), and genocide (murder of a whole people). The Sixth Commandment also presumes the positive duty to do all the good we can to ourselves and others both physically and spiritually.

Human life is important as well because it was redeemed for eternity by Jesus Christ on the Cross. “God demonstrates his own love for us in this: while we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8, NIV). Christ did not die for dogs, horses, whales, or snail darters. He died for sinful, lost, degraded human souls.

Implications of the Divine Gift

What does all this mean today? It means that the Christian must stand for the inherent value of every human life at whatever point of existence, and the sovereignty of God over that life. Romans 14:7-8 says, “For none of us lives to himself alone and none of us dies to himself alone. If we live, we live to the Lord; and if we die, we die to the Lord. So, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord” (NIV). This is the only view of humanity that keeps us from being exploited by tyrants, and keeps people–unborn children and Alzheimer’s victims–from being destroyed for anyone’s convenience.

The Christian must value the life of the baby in the womb. The Bible teaches that God knows the unborn child (Psalm 139:13-16), and has a plan for it. John the Baptist, as a six-month old fetus in Elizabeth’s womb, leaped for joy when Mary, the mother of Jesus, entered her house when Jesus was only recently conceived by the Holy Spirit. “If Mary had gotten an abortion, what would she have aborted–a potential human being or the eternal Son of God? There can be only one answer” (Kent Hughes, Disciplines of Grace, p. 117.)

The whole tenor of Bible teaching on life is in direct opposition to abortion in general and specifically to abortion on demand. Abortion on demand–for the convenience of the mother–is the reason for 90 percent of all the abortions performed in this country. In the United States alone, nearly 35 million human beings–almost the same number as the total killed in World War II–have met their end in an abortion clinic since 1973. The figures worldwide are even more horrendous. One could say that abortion is one of the worst human health hazards of the late 20th Century.

Abortions claim the lives of 28,000 babies per week. The detestable “partial birth abortion”–all but the head of the baby is delivered and then the skull is crushed and the brain is suctioned out–is performed on thousands of babies per year. It has been performed on babies as late as 32 weeks. This is only six weeks short of delivery, at a time when such infants are clearly viable outside of the womb.

The abortion issue has cropped up in the Church of the Brethren. In 1972, Annual Conference said, “Brethren oppose abortion because it destroys fetal life.” The 1984 Statement on Abortion says, “The Church of the Brethren opposes abortion because the rejection of unborn children violates the love by which God creates and nurtures human life.” It would be good for Brethren leaders and ministers to more strongly uphold these positions, and for congregations to take the lead in helping those with unwanted pregnancies.

Michael Horton writes, “In order to engage in this serious sin [abortion], a Christian must actually deny a cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith. He or she must deny that God is the Sovereign author of life who alone has the power and right to give and take away human breath, and he must also deny the creature, destroying his or her dignity as an image bearer of God Himself” (The Law of Perfect Freedom, p. 151).

The Christian must stand for the value of those who are no longer productive in society’s eyes. This includes older persons, the mentally retarded, the handicapped, and those in chronic pain. The world says our value depends on how much we can produce (functionalism). This was the controlling view of Nazism and Communism; hence those who were not productive or who did not mean certain standards found themselves in concentration camps. Those who do not or cannot function have no right to life, is the thinking of this worldview.

The Bible teaches that our value depends on God’s grace and mercy in creating us and sustaining our existence. Human life is therefore valuable in itself; its value does not depend on achievement, quality, or any other human standard. It has value simply because God made it so. The life of a skid row bum is just as important to God as that of Billy Graham.

Holding human life as sacred means that Christians stand against assisted suicide and euthanasia. Annual Conference in 1996 adopted a strong statement, saying, “Every life is important and precious in the sight of God… The active and intentional taking of life, including assisted suicide, is unacceptable” (1996 Annual Conference Booklet, p. 282).

God calls us to support others in their living and in their dying. Some think such persons are a “burden” to their family or to society. But, Galatians 6:2 reminds us that we are to “Carry each other’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.” “Even a deaf, mute, blind, severely retarded, unborn quadriplegic is viewed by God as the ‘the apple of His eye.’ This is essential to the orthodox Judeo-Christian worldview” (Thomas K. Johnson, The Outlook, Vol. 46, No. 1, January 1996).

Some may argue that we are more humane to our animals when they suffer, than we are to fellow human beings. They wonder why we can’t have “mercy” and end the painful existence of another person. But it is not the humane nor the human thing to do. Again, Joni Eareckson Tada writes, “Injecting a terminally ill person will a lethal drug would be inhuman. We put animals to sleep because they do not know they are dying. They can make nothing of their misery or mortality…. A person who asks for mercy killing, however, is no mere animal. Humans have immortal souls and will one day either walk through gates of pearl or gates of hell. Humans are capable of making something of their misery and mortality. For this reason, they deserve to have their spirits bolstered; they need courage and encouragement. Dying people are not failures–their lives must be shored up against defeat and despair.”

Standing for human life also means upholding the value of each individual. This means we stand for purity, holiness, and righteousness, and against pornography and extreme exploitation. It means we will not engage in harboring anger and contempt for others, for Jesus taught that murder in mind and heart is as wrong as murder in action. Paul condemned “hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions, and envy” (Galatians 5:19). Christians must also stand for the value of the lives of our enemies. Jesus taught us to love our enemies (Matthew 5:43-47), whether they be personal or national. This means we stand against war and the indiscriminate taking of human life.

May we pray and work that we will stand for the weakest and most vulnerable human lives. May we honor the image of God and his highest creation by upholding the sacred right to life. May we do our part in assisting expectant mothers to bring their babies to term and caring for them after birth. May we also encourage those who are discouraged and despairing of life. Remember, Jesus said, “I was sick and you visited me” (Matthew 25:36).

 

Register Now

BBI Registration Now Open!

Come explore God’s Word with us!. “So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. – Romans 10:17”

THE BOOK OF DANIEL

Captivity… Dreams… Rulers… Fire… Lions… Prayers… Kingdoms. From a dedicated youth to a faithful sage, Daniel’s life stands as an example to follow.  Yet beyond his personal life, God gifted Daniel with a message of future events.  Though difficult to grasp, these events would shape the world for the coming Messiah and the Second Coming of Christ as King.

STUDIES IN LUKE

Luke presents a warmly personal and historically accurate account of Jesus as “the Son of Man.” This course will survey the Third Gospel, with emphasis on the unique events, miracles, and parables of Jesus found in it.

HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH

This class will provide a broad overview of general church history. We will then focus on the Anabaptist and Pietist movements, especially as they relate to the formation and development of the Brethren groups. This is a two-part class. Plan to take both parts.

ONE FOUNDATION

This course is intended to lay down a measure in a world where truth is slippery and often subject to interpretation. Where “Christian Values” become a political slogan, and “good people” are our allies despite their faulty core beliefs. Where Facebook “friends” post memes about the power of God, despite a lifestyle that is anything but Godly. In the process we often fight among ourselves, doing Satan’s work for him. The purpose of this course is to lay the measure of Jesus Christ against the cults, religions, and worship in our contemporary world.

THE APOCRYPHA

While Protestant translations of the Bible contain 66 books, the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches recognize additional canonical books as well.  Where did these books, collectively known as the Apocrypha, come from and why aren’t they part of our Bible?  How reliable are they, and what value is there in studying them?

STUDIES IN 1 AND 2 PETER

The goal of this class is to acquire a firm grasp of the teachings and themes of these two general epistles. Peter covers topics from salvation and suffering to spiritual deception and the return of Christ. These letters are packed with warnings and encouragements for Christian living.

THE GREAT I AM’S OF CHRIST

A detailed study of Jesus Christ and His relationship to the “I Am” metaphors in John’s gospel. Why did Jesus describe himself in these terms? How do they relate to each other? We will look at spiritual and practical applications to further our Christian growth.

JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES: AN AMERICAN CULT

Have you ever been visited by someone who said they wanted to study the Bible with you so that you might discover the truth together?  Jehovah’s Witnesses claim to have much in common with evangelical Christians, and they seem to be well versed in the scriptures.  But what do they really believe and how can we effectively witness to those who have been ensnared by this false religion?

THE BOOK OF HOSEA

While we may consider Hosea as one of the minor prophets, his message vividly illustrates the major doctrine in all Scriptures.  The theme of God’s unconditional love is magnified and extended beyond those deserving it.  God expresses tender words towards His erring people inviting them to turn from sin to reconciliation with Him.

CHURCH LEADERSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION

This course will look at basic principles and polity of leading the local church. We will examine the balance between upholding a spiritually focused organism of ministry and cultivating proper order for effective organization. Practical applications will be emphasized. This is a two-part class. Plan to take both parts.

STATEMENT OF CONDUCT

The Brethren Bible Institute believes in the discipline of the whole person (spirit, soul, and body). We will aim to train students not only about how to study the Bible in a systematic way (2 Timothy 2:15), but also how to live soberly and righteously and godly in this present world (Titus 2:12). God calls Christians to the highest of character when He commands us to be holy (1 Peter 1:15), and holiness requires discipline.

Indulgence in the use of tobacco, alcoholic beverages, drugs, profanity, and gambling are forbidden at BBI. Objectionable literature will be prohibited. Students are asked not to use the college pool during the Institute. Each student must be thoughtful, and respect the rights of others at all times, especially during study and rest periods.

A friendly social group intermingling of students between class periods, and at general school activities is encouraged. Each student should enjoy the friendship of the entire group. At all times, highest standards of social conduct between men and women must be maintained. This means that all forms of unbecoming behavior and unseemly familiarities will be forbidden.

Personal appearance and grooming tell much about one's character. Students are expected to be dressed in good taste. In an attempt to maintain Scriptural expressions of simplicity, modesty, and nonconformity, the following regulations shall be observed while attending BBI.

MEN should be neatly attired and groomed at all times. Fashion extremes and the wearing of jewelry should be avoided on campus. The hair should not fall over the shirt-collar when standing, nor should it cover the ears.

WOMEN should wear skirts cut full enough and of sufficient length to at least come to the knees when standing and sitting. Form-fitting, transparent, low-neckline, or sleeveless clothing will not be acceptable. Slacks and culottes are permitted only for recreation and then only when worn under a skirt of sufficient length. Wearing jewelry should be avoided on campus. Long hair for women is encouraged and all Church of the Brethren girls (and others with like convictions) shall be veiled on campus.

The Institute reserves the right to dismiss any student whose attitude and behavior is not in harmony with the ideals of the School, or whose presence undermines the general welfare of the School, even if there is no specific breach of conduct.

The Brethren Bible Institute is intended to provide sound Bible teaching and wholesome Christian fellowship for all who desire it. The Bible School Committee worked hard and long at the task of arriving at standards, which will be pleasing to the Lord. It is not always easy to know just where the line should be drawn and we do not claim perfection. No doubt certain standards seem too strict for some and too loose for others. If you are one who does not share all these convictions, we hope you will agree to adjust to them for the School period, for the sake of those who do. We are confident that the blessings received will far outweigh any sacrifice you may have to make. If you have a special problem or question, please write to us about it. To be accepted as a student at BBI, you will need to sign a statement indicating that you will cooperate with the standards of the School.